The Virgin Islands’ shoreline is the site of disputes between public and private interests. (Michele Weichman photo)

Carib - Public and Private Interests Clash at the Coastline

When it comes to the Virgin Islands’ shoreline, there’s a narrow path between public access and private property rights.

In recent years, the highly sensitive issue has seemed to lie dormant under a compromise of sorts. While under the territory’s Open Shorelines Act, all beaches are public, and anyone may access them via the water, only commercial establishments such as hotels have been required to provide some sort of public access across their property.

A recent government report has raised the issue again and has alarmed some people worried that private property rights may be in jeopardy in the future.

Government officials stress there is no immediate effort to change the status quo and say that nothing will happen without considering all ramifications.

In October, the Coastal Zone Management Division of the Department of Planning and Natural Resources released a voluminous document reviewing various aspects of land management in the islands’ coastal zone. Included was a section discussing the need to protect and possibly expand public access to shorelines and raising the possibility of requiring residential property owners in beachfront areas to provide for public access.

That quickly raised objections from members of the local real estate community, who cited concerns for protecting private property rights and pointed out numerous legal and practical complications, including security and insurance concerns.

In an interview with the Source Thursday, CZM Director Marlon Hibbert implied that the real estate industry jumped the gun in submitting objections to the report. He said the division is not moving to implement any changes for shorelines in the near future and is aware of and sensitive to legal and practical considerations.

The report that triggered the latest look at Open Shorelines policy is a routine, generally in-house document that federal partners require all Coastal Management Programs throughout the country to submit periodically.

In this case, the “Section 309 Assessment and Strategy, FY 2023-2025” must be completed by CZM and approved by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for the territory’s CZM program to be eligible for certain NOAA funding.

NOAA requires periodic review of nine different areas of CZM management, including such subjects as marine debris, aquaculture and ocean resources, and it asks the local officials to list priority areas.

In the recent Assessment and Strategy report, CZM listed three areas as high priority: wetlands, coastal hazards and public access.

But it is seeking NOAA funds only for the first two, wetlands and coastal hazards.

In the report, CZM said that factors such as erosion caused by climate change and a proliferation of private residences used as vacation rentals have given a sense of urgency to the need to protect public access.

“The CZM program acknowledges that public access and addressing the challenges to creating and ensuring long-term enduring public access to the shoreline are a priority for the territory,” the report states. However, it continues, “A strategy to address public access is not being developed at this time under the §309 program because other program and funding opportunities exist that can be utilized to address some of the identified needs and management priorities.”

In the interview, Hibbert added that CZM also wants more time to research the best strategies to increase public access without negative impacts on property owners.

“We agree it’s a very complicated issue,” Hibbert said. “It needs careful consideration. … We’re certainly not in the business of taking away property rights.”

Such assurances did not completely allay fears for private property rights or the concerns raised by real estate experts in a response to the report.

The report identifies public access as a priority and references the possibility of using eminent domain or other mechanisms to require public easements across residential shoreline properties.

“It’s still something that’s in writing,” said Scott Newland, a St. Thomas real estate agent who studied the report and shared his concerns with others in the industry, leading to a response to the report from the Virgin Islands Territorial Association of Realtors.

“I think it’s something that needs to be addressed,” Newland said.

Read more.